Comments on: Kitta’s Formulas

By: dwbl

dwbl — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:09:37 +0000

awesome.

late night sessions + imagining atoms colliding = well, this.

but of course, that’s for American Ivy girls. Aussies must be a different chart non? hehe

specially with image #1.

Caity — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:22:26 +0000

Haha, that is fantastic! That’s something I would do.

Zannnie — Sat, 02 May 2009 08:43:47 +0000

this post is kind-of funny, i think, in the midst of a boring study…you’ve made a clever formula that’s amusing!

Mike Massacre — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:04:48 +0000

Pure LOL. I think that this formula apply the girl. However, as the Man I can not agree with the several statements

Dom^2 + Sub^2 is more like Se–+ cause the system will have Se2- as the base for the Man.

Everything else is quite good though ))))

Hey! What about the formula transitions? Can you move |Se| through the expression?

My Life Thinking — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:43:44 +0000

Good luck

Dan — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:53:38 +0000

Kitta you are such a nimbi lol lol I bet you have your whip and hand cuffs at all time lol lol Naughty girl you .. :))

Amanda — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:05:04 +0000

Awesome.

Keg — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:25:30 +0000

You’re such a queer.

Luckily that’s why we love you

Reece — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:33:56 +0000

Theoretical rule or result of rigorous testing?

Kitta — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:17:24 +0000

@grum: Jock.